You may have noticed several differences between the written "Remarkable Events" essay that appears in the WD Gann Predictions blog and the YouTube presentation. The written essay was created as a script for the then planned Youtube presentation; an outline. The YouTube presentation contained many more "messages" and information that were not in the written essay. Among the added information was the following:
The central point of my work over the last two years has seemed to circle back to the date October 19, 2016. Perhaps a unifying bias that so directs my work to untruth. Perhaps something destined. Certainly a question to be answered in the next four days.
The alternate of the slide that appeared in the YouTube presentation shows I favored, that if in the vastly improbable event the feared disasters were to occur, then they would follow the "Knowing" timeline. Alternately they would follow the two-day timeline of "San Andreas." So, I am encouraged that I am wrong but will not be fully relieved until October 20.
About the nature of my work with WD Gann's "The Tunnel Thru the Air." It's all about clues that range from the vastly probable to the highly speculative. Vastly probable, the "six e's." The first paragraph of the Foreword contains six lines of supposedly random test all ending with the letter "e." This is vastly improbable and demonstrates the authors notification to the alert and aware reader that the book is encoded with acrostic and telestic letters that may provide information.
Now flip to a messy such as the "fifth warning." A page of acrostic and telestic letters, say 72 letters that might be configured to spell words and intelligible, relevant message such as:
Atlantis Oil and Gas Platform set on fire.
It could be re-interpreted to give you:
Alberta set on fire - oil and gas sands.
The statistics of the six e's are vastly improbable making it conclusive that the author wanted to pass along a message. Conversely, if you studied the 72 letters that might be used to create the two messages above in an imperfect subset of those letters, well, you can create many messages. The statistics do not support any level of certainty of the prediction.
It all boils down to clues. I do not have what I believe Mr. Gann had; a mathematic method of discerning the curve of time and how all things fit into that curve of time. Something he said he derived from his study of the Bible. What I have is just clues which, as the subjectivity of spoken and written language toes, are very imperfect.
*** ***
Two alternatives remain. First, the timeline follows "San Andreas" and the three great geologic events occur rapidly beginning the afternoon of October 18 ending the afternoon of October 19. Second, I'm entirely wrong. The latter being vastly probable by any measure of probability.
Hopefully, I am wrong.
Thank you for your interest,
Jim Ross
